Analysis of General Theories of History Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Analysis of General Theories of History - Essay ExampleExperiences from angiotensin-converting enzyme generation to another do not vary greatly thereby it is important to learn lessons from the boilersuit course of tale. The first attempt to record the science of history was undertaken by the Greeks about twenty-five hundred years ago. The need to comprehend history and translate its effects into the future does not arise in societies with long-standing and relatively steady social structures. Such a state of personal matters is not wedded practically consideration. However, when societies face sudden drastic turmoil which triggers changes in the social structure, then understanding the underlying motives which lead to the change becomes imperative. Usually wars, travelling, trade and colonization result in an entirely different culture existence imposed on the fellowship which they come into contact with. This forced integration of diverse cultures culminates in a clash bet ween different social strata so it becomes crucial to identify and comprehend the sources and foundations of such oppositions. men of knowledge compare and contrast various sorts of governments and social structures in an attempt to resolve differences and bring harmoniousness to the society. It is obvious that conflict resolution is not possible unless conflict description and diagnosis are perfect enough. The role and responsibility of creating accurate problem diagnosis is within the domain of semipolitical theorists. Neither has history been created nor perk up our social structures evolved in accordance with a pre-defined plan. Nature has not dictated the course of events kind of it is the people who compose societies who chose their cultural norms, established various institutions and developed ideologies. It is time to realize that the human temperament itself is determined by changes in life and labour. History has been shaped by economic progress, division of society in different social-economic strata, changes in condition of labour, advancements in production and trading. In this respect there have been a number of different contributions to thought on political history from various quarters. The evolution of political history in its current forms can be seen as deriving from the Age of Enlightenment where thinkers such as Hegel and Kant picked up the gauntlet to define history in such a manner. This work was carried on later by numerous others including Karl Marx who has had a major impact on the modern day given his role in the creation of a communist ideology. In more modern terms, the earliest thoughts on the philosophy of history derived from the views and work of Kant. He held that humanity had been driven into its current state of autonomy through the use of enlightened despotism (Kant, 1991) (Murphy, 1994). Kants views on the issue can be seen more clearly through his work titled Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purp ose. Kant produced a paradoxical picture by expounding on the one hand that national liberation was sole(prenominal) possible through enlightened despotism while ultimate autonomy rested entirely with the undivideds will to gain it (Williams, 1992). Kant recognised that history ensured that progress had to come in human affairs but Kants method of delineating the mechanism remains self-contradictory (Hampsher-Monk, 1993). Strangely he holds that liberation lies simply through