Comparisons of war poems Essay

In exploring the portrayal of war in the metrical composition of Wilfred Owen and Shakespeare one can see the secernate attitudes and realities of war. In before Agincourt set in 1415 composed by Shakespeare, he portrays the jubilate and honour in war, whilst Anthem for goddam youth composed by Wilford aver set in 1914 is expressing the meaning slight and practical(prenominal) thoughts of view.In the first of all stanza which Shakespeare has composed in the rime before Agincourt. He employs manipulating concepts that communicate the message that war is a salient adventure and that you should die for your coun adjudicate. Whilst Anthem for unredeemed youth is doing the exact opposite and tries to allure the endorser that war is a fearful ordeal. As the two poesys where written in an interval of five hundred old age it shows us very clearly the incompatible orientate of few tidy sum had in their perspective time about war. originally Agincourt is a very patriotic an d gilded poem. In the first stanza Shakespeare uses a hardy tone. He uses emotional adjectives and verbs to make the reader feel the same as he does. He also uses a constituent of positive nouns to shape this affect e.g. greater share of honour Gods will. on that point is not much alliteration or any form of onomatopoeia in the first stanza.The second stanza uses a lot of emphatic words and longer pauses before the attached line he also uses repeating of words starting with M. In the stand stanza of the poem he does not use any assonance, onomatopoeia and alliteration technics to emphasize his poem. He only uses strong punctuation and pauses to create a very positive burn down on war. This poem could be use as a propaganda device.Anthem for deuced Youth composed by Wilford Owen.In the title of this poem Wilford is expressing that war is negative. specify is a simile to convey inevitability of death, Doom also uses assonance with the fork-like Os. It has an affect of bei ng scarey and threatening.The first stanza uses repetition to add unit of ammunition and onomatopoeias to create a to a greater extent living approach on war.The second stanza uses a lot of repetition and emphasised words. e.g. No mockeries, no prayers nor bells. No mockeries is implying no more joy and that they cant be mocked any more because they have perished. The No is also emphasised to split up the poem more rhythm. No prayers nor bells. Is repetition, it also has a sad motive.The tone goes up to give the poem more negativity and rue by elongating some words.The third stanza uses a rhetorical question to start discharge with. The mood is a lot softer. This is created by the poet using a softer tone to condense the Ss, Ps and Rs. He uses repetition to try and enhances the readers sadness and optic resource.There are also a lot of similes and metaphors used. E.g. pallor, paleness, brows, forehead. In the last stanza there is a vast amount of imagery of death. There is an ethical custom to cogitate his poem. Drawing down of blind this is what people at home did when a obstruct relative died.Comparing these two poems reveals that Shakespeares before Agincourt uses a lot less alliteration and repetition making the poem more joyful and honourable for war.In conclusion Shakespeare is totally glorifying war time Wilford more realistically looking at war as a dreadful killer concept. Style wise I prefer Shakespeare poem having a polished ring to its rhythm but the heart and soul of his poem is out dated and raw man would find it hard to declare with his idealistic point of views. Personally I can understand Wilfords Owens point of view better then Shakespears. struggle is a horrifying non justifiable depend and should not be promoted.